Sandy, Nilam and Obama

It was only on Pritha Sen’s satus which asked of us that while we were so concerned with Sandy in the US, we seemed to be less bothered about our own Andhra coast, ravaged by the storm Nilam. There was in our concern for Sandy and lack of concern for Nilam, a kind of slavery towards the US, our new found colonial master. I took her words and put it up as my status in which friends from the US commented that since no one they knew lived in coastal Andhra, they did not bother to ask. It did not cross their minds that people are always visiting these places on work, especially while so many of us are in the development sector that requires travelling to such places where none of our kin would live. But on hindsight, friends in the US were right not to be concerned about the Nilam, because really in India, no one of our social class, especially those inhabiting the Facebook are ever in trouble, whether in floods, or famines, or epidemics and droughts. Our class in India is well protected against vulnerability. This is not the same for the members of our class when they go to the US. They face what we probably would have never faced in generations; evacuation, food rations, no electricity, no water supply, floods, immobility and in short vulnerability against calamities, natural, or manmade. While some suffered the Partition or the earthquake as loss of property, people in the class we come from has not sunk into the depths of poverty as a result of that. In India, our class is protected; in the US, our kith and kin are not.

If we were to construct an index of vulnerability, then the middle class in the US is far more vulnerable than what we are ever in India. I have used some simple math to settle the vulnerability score. Would I to earn the same number of dollars as I earn my rupees, I would be as rich as the Jindals or the Tatas. Would my friends to earn the same number of rupees as dollars, they would be at the level of my house manager or my driver. The vulnerability of my friends in the US and my house help is at the same level. However, due to the differential value of the dollar, my friends in the US earn four times more than I do.

I have often wondered that the middle class in India is a different proposition from the middle class in America. In India, the middle class is a political class, the intelligentsia. Having emerged from the upper castes of various professions, the middle class in India via the bureaucracy and the political class has been a ruling class. The middle class in the US has been a class of skilled workers. The civil servants, lawyers, and the political class have been in an intermediate space between the working class and the ruling class but has never quite been the ruling class. The ruling class in the US has been the corporates; in India, till as recently as the UPA 2, corporates have struggled for legitimacy. No wonder then in terms of vulnerability to calamities, the Indian middle class, due to its position as a ruling class is better off than the corresponding class in the US. This is why, elections and change in the government just as in the case of the present Presidential election affects my friends as deeply as it did. I am not much bothered with a change in the government except ideologically of what the future of my country would be as a consequence. Since I am a ruler, I am worried about larger things in life those which do not directly affect my fate.

The middle class in America is a consumer class; defined by income and occupation rather than by learning and culture. The middle class in India is a culture class; defined by values and attitudes, beliefs and practices. While the middle class definitely needs money to reproduce itself in a minimum modicum of dignity and to pursue culture the way it would like to, culture and not money defines the middle class. The American middle class is a working class; not culture but incomes and the level of consumption it can access defines its status. The American middle class looks towards a level of consumption. The American middle class consumes culture; culture which someone else produces for it. Theories of film, culture and communication those emanate from the American Universities assert that the role of the media is to produce culture so that the recipients consume the same. In India, because the middle class is a ruling class, it is itself a producer of culture. It produces culture to create culture, to share culture, to put culture into currency. When the Indian middle class produces culture it tries to define culture; when the Americans produce culture they seek to hegemonize a culture consuming class. The intent of producing culture is not the same for the two countries.

The above plays an interesting part in American politics. Politics in India is not about the ruling class which is as secured against politics as it is against calamities; politics in India is about challenging the ruling class, not by taking away from its powers but sharing and partaking in the exercise of the same. This is why; politics in India is all about giving the poor a fairer share, including the excluded community like the minorities and Dalits. The US politics is about macro issues; policies that subject an entire nation to some kind of a discipline and morality which then contains the individuals. Citizenship in India is about ruling; citizenship in the US is about consuming. Green Card is a major issue, as social security is. The American middle class wants shelter, a chaperon, a shepherd. It does not have a desire to rule as the Indian middle class has.

Politics that shape India and America are thus bound to be shaped by differences in the middle class of these two countries. When America wants the FDI in retail, it promises to help its corporate class by opening up avenues for larger revenues. With the value of rupee falling ungraciously vis-à-vis the dollar, any retail chain from America can use the Indian economy to earn very large market shares and attain global dominance. This is a palpable opportunity that a recession hit America can hardly let go. But FDI will not stop at retail. The US trade policy which is up for review in the WTO shortly is clear about shifting investments into India if the outsourcing jobs are cut. Instead of outsourcing, the US companies will shift lock, stock and barrel in India. This will again help corporate profits but will leave the unemployed at the very same 7.5% in which it presently resides. Obama only promises that he will prevent Indians from staying on in America for good. For the present moment this is about students who go for higher studies in the US, but once this discourse is voted for, such ethnic discrimination is bound to only rise against the Indians.

 

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Rajat Gupta

For Rajat Gupta, the worldwide head of McKinsey Group, all good things in life has ended with his sentencing by the US courts. His crime has been insider trading, a crime which to an Indian is no crime at all. For an Indian, while it is important to accumulate and show that wealth off it is not his priority to respect the wealth of the others. Indians do not respect property rights in general; in trains one does not respect seat reservations, one grabs land by hook and crook, callously evicts slums and villages in the name of development, one throws rubbish in front of neighbour’s homes, one never repairs damaged walls of neighbours caused by own renovations. There is also no respect for property because public services like water, electricity and sewage facilities are almost always denied to most people, especially in the poorer colonies and the city suburbs. In fact, since in India the only route to upward mobility has become money, not only the mindless acquisition of money becomes legitimate but those who are too weak to defend their own property against the onslaught of attack by the powerful are looked down upon as being lesser beings who do not deserve protection because they are too weak to protect themselves. This creates a tremendous scope for the use of force and physical power in the society, obviously backed by money power. Most of us therefore acknowledge that making money by any means whatsoever is quite fine and it is also fine to defend that ill-gotten wealth by fraud and force and of course influence created through bribery. Rajat Gupta’s model of making money by fraud was therefore a legitimate and commonplace Indian aspiration, namely to have a desire for wealth without any respect for those of others. And he had the commonly found Indian stupidity not to understand that in America destruction of one’s wealth can be of lethal consequence.

Rajat Gupta has been brilliant in the sense of clearing the IIT examination. This means he must have been good in his PCM. But in affairs of the liberal disciplines, which consist of sociology, history, politics, philosophy and ethics and even the wider range of humanities as in literature, he must have been in the pits. Further, because India was poor and his own family of humble means, he probably looked down upon them as being defeated. What he did not understand was that the accommodation of the Indian society to wannabes or the parvenus in the sense of upwardly mobile humanity is much more than anywhere else in the world. This tolerance of wannabes actually makes India a freer country than probably any upon this earth. America does not tolerate wannabes. America appreciates talent, pays well for it, but will never allow crossing certain boundaries. Rajat Gupta was fine as long as he generated intellectually vapid papers based on rubbish macroeconomics which seemed like business strategies. I have had the good fortune to read through some of McKinsey’s output and I moved papers immediately proposing a training centre in our office to train people in Indian economy. But his papers were doing just what so many of the neoliberal financiers desired; to promise profits where there were none so that they could wash off some of their non-performing assets to other wannabes. The sale of coal properties in Australia priorly owned by the world’s largest mining company, the BHP Billiton is an illustration of such deals.

As long as Rajat Gupta was an instrument in making money for the American capitalists, he was fine. But when he started buying property which were part of the American dream, when he moved close to the American propertied class, put his children into the best schools as in Harvard, Rajat Gupta became a lice in the headful of hair for the American capitalists. Hence Rajat Gupta had to be thrown out. America is not India where the Lalaji Jindals can become industrialists. America is not India where only the lower castes have become Emperors in its long history of two thousand years. America is a place where wages and salaries may be fair, but any attempt to cross the threshold of class can be put down as severely as crushing down a rebel by having them trampled over by elephants.

America has severe sentences; Rajat Gupta’s two year in jail is actually a mild sentence. What is much ruinous is the pecuniary fine. He has to dissolve and surrender all his wealth and return to his original humility. Rajat Gupta is a reminder to all Indians who despite having behind them a Freedom Movement which is the world’s largest mass movement, now competes among one another to surrender that freedom to become a slave to America. Remain that slave, silent and subservient; if you imagine that you can ever be a master of your own fate in America, beware; Rajat Gupta is exemplarily held up before every wannabe, stupid, slavish Indian.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Politics | Tagged | 1 Comment

ebaar Uma ele….

Purna Chowdhury’s status on Mahalaya day, ‘ebaar Uma ele” makes me think why Bengalis invariably organize the Durga Puja? One has to be a Bengali by birth to be able to organize this enormous event called the Durga Puja. It is a mammoth event of which the decorative pandals and the exquisite clay figures of Gods, Goddesses, Demon and animals are actually the tip of the iceberg. What lies beneath is a colossal coordination among weavers, carpenters, wood carvers, pandal makers, screen painters, artists, conceptualisers, architects, florists, lightmen, electricians, makeup artists, copyrighters, printers, publicity managers, queue managers, caterers, space marketing people, public relations persons to negotiate with the police and neighbours, accountants, cooks, mechanics, fitters, welders, and of course the fund raisers. One needs to acquire some kind of a social status to rope in celebrities, to be able to convince friends and friends of friends to be able to put up a show of this grand a scale. This is not all, every Puja must reveal some kind of a wider consciousness in the themes they adhere to. Themes may cover anti-terrorism, Iraq aggression, Indira Gandhi’s assassination, anti GM food, anti-clones, anti-female foeticide and so on.
A puja pandal is also a veritable forum of social reform, something that Bengal seems to have patented with its Renaissance. Durga Puja is not worship alone; worship is only incidental to it; the Durga Puja is actually a cultural event of the Bengali, an attempt to present before the world its consciousness about the various things that make up our contemporary reality. It is Bengali’s contribution to installation art, long before the concept was ever invented. It is Bengali’s spreading out of the public sphere where the electronic and the print media seem to fall short. It is the Bengali’s emergence into a civil society that operates between the reproductive society and the political society; it is the maturation of the Bengali club, of peer bonds, of friendship and camaraderie.
A Durga Puja once rolled out is easier to maintain, but to start it anew is sociology of community mobilization worthy of documentation. While we have had histories of Durga Puja, we never had sociology of Durga Puja. Bengalis, constructed as a loser community, doing well only when outside Bengal, a community known for internal bickerings and mutual envy does put up a show that requires the dense accumulation of the finest variety of social capital. I wonder why did sociologists never study the Durga Puja?
Durga Puja is perhaps the only event in which not only the emotions and passions of the Bengali comes to fore but also his enormous spirit of entrepreneurship. Those who imagine that Bengalis have no business mind, no entrepreneurial capacity and no initiative to work hard must watch the puja preparations. Actually, the Durga Puja is the great displaced symbol of the Bengali enterprise and industry. Durga Puja happens precisely because avenues for a Bengali are blocked on so many fronts. Thus, to my mind, a study of the Durga Puja must be located in Bengal’s industry and not so much in its worship. A Bengali goes into Kalibari for worship, to the Ramkrishna Mission for sublime transcendence but a Durga pandap is never to be confused with her search for God. For the Bengali, the Durgamandap is her ramp walk, her ballroom, her art exhibition, her theatre for spectator art, her club lounge, in short, her space to locate and present her entire Being.
Bengal has always been an industrialized state; it was in the way of the Silk Road where India exported the chequered cloth known to Bengal as the gamchha but used as a hood by Arab men, medicines, oilseeds, mustard, poppy seeds, textiles, and other crafts like woven baskets and fishing nets, ropes and wooden planks for boats. After colonialization, trade of Bengal shifted expectedly to agro based products like indigo and jute and later to pure agricultural produce, paddy, or dhaan. Paradoxically, the destruction of industries also urbanized Bengal, built out of a culture of babudom, where babus were petty zamindars making money out of paddy auctions. Durga Puja was set up by this urbanized noveau riche, where the riches made them desirous of power but the colonial government denied its exercise to them. Durga Puja was thus a paradox; it was at once the manifestation of a new wave of cultural renaissance made possible with the rise of the new bhadralok class and at the same time a moment of tremendous powerlessness because of the usurpation of the government by the East India Company.
However, Durga Puja continued well into Independence and even after it; it only increased in number, scale and scope. It grew out of the Bengali’s sense of industry and innovation; out of its culture and creativity. It was Bengal’s Ala Mohan Das who raised foundries in Howrah to such a standard that even today manhole covers and drain cases are exported from here to Canada and Western Europe. Bengal’s printing is one of the best in India, textiles continue to rule and interestingly it is the only province where displacement due to Partition, or retrenchment from locked out factories has only spurned trade and manufacturing. The local train in Bengal sells stuff through which China once captured the world market. Bengal’s industries are based on community capital, social networks, patronages, creativity and innovation; the Durga Puja adds another vital angle, namely aesthetics. Durga Puja is Bengali’s dream industry, it has a team, camaraderie, social capital, community resources, civil society, civic consciousness, public relations, public sphere, and with that culture and arts. This kind of business also has another attraction; it ceases to be after a week leaving the Bengali to pursue other kinds of interests. Unlike a Marwari, the Bengali’s business is not about money-commodity-money, but money-product-culture. While the Bengalis has done business like nobody has, yet she cannot indulge in industry for money. Unfortunately for Bengal, Independent India’s polity has always supported the Marwari model of money making instead of the Bengali model of innovation, culture and the production of aesthetics. No wonder then Bengal has never trusted the “Centre” and always resented the Marwari.
Durga in her image of the warrior gives us the strength to defy the demon of the Marwari hiding behind the buffalo of the ‘Hindustanis” at the centre. It is an impulse of Bengali industry against the mindless and brain dead capitalism that the rest of India seems to laud. This is why, we cling to Durga. In Mamata Banerjee’s greeting card which she designed and painted she is seen ensconced in Durga’s lap, her protection against all that Bengal opposes via Durga. There is hardly an eye which is not tearful when Durga is immersed into the Ganges to return to her home with Shiva. We see in her immersion the pain of having to send a daughter away to her in-laws. Stories in Bengal are rife with Uma’s mother weeping at her imminent parting with the daughter as she marries and joins Shiva in the faraway mountains. Every Bengali, much like Uma’s parents fantasizes of keeping Durga with her for good. So we say, this time when Uma comes visiting we will not send her back, or as the saying goes ebaar uma ele..

Posted in Travelogues | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Bodoland via the Brahmaputra Assam 1/4

Rakesh dropped in at my office in Delhi and put forth an interesting proposal. He was going on behalf of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, henceforth the NCPCR to Kokrajhar, one of India’s nine most disturbed districts and asked me whether I would like to go along with him. Rakesh is my brother who is presently leading a carefree bachelor’s life with his wife and sons away for a holiday with his wife’s parents. I, on the other hand am stuffed with schedules of meetings and deadlines for submissions. While my head reasons with me not to distract myself with too many interests, my heart tells me that I will never get another chance to visit India’s politically disturbed areas like this. So after a bout of inner agony and ecstasy I submitted to my instincts and packed a small bag for a four day trip into lower Assam, or what today is known as the Bodo Tribal Council Area. I will call this place as Bodoland.

 

The NCPCR’s position is that children must be given education in the districts that are torn asunder by civil unrest so as to catch them early and mainstream them so that they do not grow up to handle arms. Only a body as far removed from the reality as the NCPCR could think like this. Those who handle arms especially in the north east are more often than not students, produced and frustrated by the very education that the Commission was trying to entrench and deepen. Also, I do not believe in the exploitation and oppression theory behind violence; I feel that it is a desire to dominate over the rest of the society by groups in situations where no one group has any clear domination over the others. Anyway, eager to jump into the field, I called the cab and swished into the swank T3 airport to catch a Jet flight to Guwahati.

 

Aboard the full flight from Delhi to Guwahati I sat beside a mother and child duo. The child, a boy of about eight years sat by the window, the mother in the middle and I, by choice sat at the aisle. The boy agitated by his entrapment into the cramped bucket seat thumped and stomped irritably. I was getting very angry as I tried to catch some sleep and read Dave Prager’s book on Delhi at the same time. The mother was indisciplined too and after several berated warnings by the steward to stow away her front table, she continued to keep her bag resting there. Soon my ears buzzed and I knew that the plane was dropping altitude in preparation for landing when suddenly the boy child nudged sharply at his mother and said dehho, Brahmaputra !! (Look, the Brahmaputra). I pretended to rise to go to the toilet and peeped over the boys head at the proud, robust swathe of water that stretched timelessly into the earth. So confident, and so overpowering. Indeed, majestic! The boy kept looking at the Brahmaputra, singing to the river, saying rhymes in its ode and he calmed down without another noise. I was amazed how the Brahmaputra calmed the boy.

 

When I was planning my trip, I asked my Assamese boss which would be the best way to travel to lower Assam. Well, he said, and fished out a blank sheet of paper and drew an inverted L on it. This is the Brahmaputra, he said in his Assamese accent and here is Kachar, called the lower Assam which was to go to Manipur and lies now within Assam. He had no idea of how to get there because no Assamese would ever like to go into that land infested with wild tribes of the Santhals and Bengali Muslims who look like the Chinese. I marked that he never mentioned the Bodos and yet this was what was for all practical purpose the Bodo land. I think that for the Assamese, Assam is the valley of the Brahmaputra. Where there is no river, there is no Assam; it is the river that marks their homeland, keeps them close to the soil of Assam and lends meaning to their everyday existence. Bhupen Hazarika, the Tagore of Assam lived and sang by this river. He saw his entire world in the waves that loll at the heart of the river, carrying the waters of the mountains to feed and nourish the lower rivers of the Bengal delta. Assam is the Brahmaputra and vice versa. Lower Assam is not Brahmaputra’s land and hence it is not Assam.

 

Rakesh and I reached Guwahati by noon and headed straight to the railway station of Kamakhya. I thought of dropping by at the temple but I was put off by the goat sacrifices and decided not to venture into unpleasant sights. So we bought tickets for the inter city express which could be boarded only after four hours. We used this long waiting time to treat ourselves to a sumptuous lunch of boiled eggs, local buns, soft and sweet, thick sweet milky tea, a piece of cake, some packed salty snacks and fresh stick of sweet and watery cucumber with stingy hot concoction of common salt and red chilly powder. Then we used the morning newspapers to squat on the platform doing our own reading of the NCPCR progress reports. Trains arrived and then proceeded for the onward destinations every now and then and the platforms filled with people speaking Bengali, Hindi, Bhojpuri, and Assamese. A man asked us for a train to Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh, someone was to go to Coochbehar; a boy made preparations to go towards Jaipur while some were headed towards Chennai. The scene that emerged slowly over the minutes and then hours was one of undivided Bengal Presidency, Muslims speaking in East Bengali dialect, Biharis speaking in musical Bhojpuri and Maithili, Oriyas, Nepalese and even people speaking the Santhali language loitered along the railway platforms, chewing paan, drinking tea, nibbling biscuits and simply looking for a place to sit and sink into. The serenity of Kamakhya, the wet green of the land, the damp cool breeze and the occasional rain transported me to the yester era of the Bengal Presidency from where time in this railway station has not seemed to move. What was lodged in my mind as being just a corner of the country now appeared to me to be its very centre. West Bengal, in comparison to Assam looked provincial and vernacular.

 

We reached Kokrajhar well past the evening. We could see the Brahmaputra for quite a while as we chugged over bridges and trailed over culverts. As long as the Brahmaputra was visible, not a single passenger in the compartment spoke. All eyes were fixated on this mighty flow of water. Again I saw the power of the Brahmaputra to mesmerize the Assamese.

 

The NCPCR resource persons and the teachers from Kokrajhar Government College came to receive us at the station. They drove us to the Circuit House where we heard that the All Assam Koch Rajbanshi Students Union, AAKRASU had called a strike which included a rail rook. The teachers told us that a bandh in Assam means a bandh when life becomes literally stand still. The resource persons had made a meticulous schedule by the half hour for us to visit various places in the field area and they were disappointed that such plans went haywire. Bandh is the disturbance of Assam; bandh is the very reason why the area is disturbed. It appears that a AKRASU bandh turned violent and the police instead of using force on the students for fear of retaliation arrested the leader. The bandh was in demand for release of the leader.

 

Assam politics is student politics; the politics is wholly controlled by the students, irrespective of whether that politics is violent, terrorist, extortionist or mainstream, participative and democratic. Hence the thesis of the NCPCR that the students will stay out of terrorism if they are educated flies in the face of the ground evidence that politics in Assam is education. The AKRASU’s demanded Kamatapur, an independent state which was to be carved out of Kokrajhar, Dhubri and Goalpara in Assam and Coochbehar in West Bengal and stretched as far as Patna in Bihar and included Sikkim and Bhutan. Kamatapur has been an ancient princely state out of which the Bengal Presidency and later Assam was carved out. The Koch Rajbanshis who ruled Kamatapur are now claiming their lost kingdom back. If there is Kamatapur then there will be no Bodoland and possibly no Assam. Kamatapur is impossibility but AKRASU uses this plank to consolidate its demand for a ST status, very much in the same lines along the Bodos. At the heart of Kamatapur is reservation for seats in colleges and jobs in the government. In absence of a robust economy, government remains the largest employer and everyone imagines herself in the role of a government servant. Hence the politics of Assam is largely the competitive democratic politics of reservations.

 

The following morning there was nothing to do. The resource persons were determined that we should not waste our day and with some effort fixed up an array of government officials we could meet. We met the officers from the Bodo Tribal Council, an autonomous self governing area consisting of the four districts of Kokrajhar, Baksa, Chirang and Udalgiri. The demand for Bodoland however stretches up to much larger tracts of Assam stopping short of just those lands from which the Brahmaputra comes into view.

 

The District Commissioner, a Bodo received as many as ten phone calls from Delhi and the Assam state government asking him to clear the railway tracks on which the Koch Rajbanshi students sat and to use brute force if needed. The District Commissioner diplomatically handled these instructions and without stepping on to any toes steadfastly refused to use violence. I could see in his face a determination not to use force. We asked the officer what the nature of disturbance in the BTC area was, he said that there was too much of violence, too many strikes, too much extortion, and kidnapping. The picture which the Commissioner presented was dismal; I imagined that there was no peace in Bodoland, no one could do any business peacefully, and all buildings were unfinished due to extortion. The resource persons too corroborated the Commissioner’s version of things in Bodoland.

 

One by one the officers irrespective of whether they were from the Bodo community or from the Santhals, or Assamese or Bengalis told us unsavoury things about the Bodos; they were wild, uncultured, uneducated, could not produce teachers, ate away the midday meals, stole cement and steel from buildings, absconded duties, ran side businesses, and captured all posts of primary teachers, anganwadi workers and Asha workers. When the news reached us late in the evening that the strike has been called off and we could travel into the villages, I had already made notes on the Bodos using their political autonomy for genocide against the Santhals to exterminate their population.

Posted in Travelogues | Leave a comment

Travelling in Bodoland – Sham Called School Assam 2/4

We set out early in the morning with a hearty breakfast of luchi and ghoogni cooked by a family of Bengali speaking Assamese staff in the Circuit House despite Shobhan, one of our resource persons fearing indigestion after the lavish helping of the oily refined wheat product. Shobhan is from Telengana, dead serious about his duties as a resource person. He is so serious that even if we sighted the odd urchin fishing in a swamp by the roadside instead of being in the school, Shobhan’s heart would sink, he would clasp nervously on to his bucket seat and look furtively at us apologizing that he has been an underperformer.

 

Throughout my stay in Assam I sensed this deep anxiety, a fear of failure that seemed to grip the people. Teachers’ faces went white when we would alight at the premises of a primary school. People would immediately say that the school buildings were not in place, there was no drinking water and there were no toilets when apparently things did look perfect. Our education campaigns have created such a fuss over toilets and class rooms that having only a building with its sanitary facilities seemed to be the be all and end all of education. Nothing can be as ridiculous as to have a school being defined in terms of its infrastructure; no one by a city based stupid policywallah can think like this. In the open fields of villages, a pucca building is the last thing which is required and sending children to a closed toilet without proper water supply and drainage is to harm them even more. Village people have their own ways of defecating; to my mind there is no tearing hurry to imitate city people especially when the required infrastructure is not there. Who needs a pucca classroom when one can easily keep the school together with bamboo poles and straw? Such classrooms are less intimidating for the children; schools with classrooms inside closed walls look like prisons anyway. But a pucca building, toilet, drinking water flowing out of a pipe seems to be the defining features of our education system. What really goes unnoticed that the children can neither understand the meaning of the letters they learn by rote, nor can “read” the illustrations and pictures contained in the pages of their books, yet teachers are tense with worry, as books have not arrived. For Heaven’s sake teach one single book for the entire duration of the school years but teach that perfectly, it will do. But the NCERT must have its own syllabus completed. What it designs for children from families of the educated, it also designs for children from families who have never seen letters from the time their species took birth upon earth. The pursuit for equality and uniformity everyday creates wedges and deepens inequality and the universal education lays the foundation for that.

 

Does the community participate in the child’s education? Yes, they do by complaining against the teacher who is more often absent than present. Unfortunately when the teacher does arrive, in almost all cases it is a man, he fails to teach. It is not as if he is not trained, but he is trained in a syllabus which is one size that has to fit all and it does not fit his. A Santhal or a Bodo does not come from a literate culture. Theirs is an oral culture. The two cultures have very different sets of cognition and one does not always easily translate into the other and each require a set of processes while transforming from one to the other. An important way to move from an oral to a literate culture is to learn how to verbally articulate. I suggested to a Bodo teacher, why you don’t allow the children to be on their own, play their games or just play truant for a while and then come and speak out what they did while they were out. The teacher gaped at me, but, he said, this is not in the teaching manual! How daft our programmes are, what takes only a few minutes for me to find out has never occurred in these long sixty five years to our educationists? I started doubting my ingenuity, for questioning the foolishness of so many people over so many years seemed absurd.

 

Whenever I insisted that every child should have cultural education, learn her own songs, memorize folk tales of the community, exercise through the dance forms and martial art, I appeared to have offended the communities. We want none of our stuff, they said. I sensed Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed was flowing out in action here. The communities felt that they were oppressed by people like us, the middle class, the government officer, and the English speaking gentry in towns. Hence education was to create their children in the images of such oppressors. The children were thus to be as far from their own communities as their oppressors were. Universal education was intended to create internal colonizers and exploiters of one’s own community. No wonder the Bodo officers were so eager to show the members of their own community in poor light. Education seems to have created monsters for our civilization, denying our historicity, our context, and the inner dynamics of our communities.

 

When I met the ABSU leaders later in the course of the day, they too had the same narrowness of vision. Their politics was over education, reservation, quota, appointments. But what does your community control? How would you control the means of production? What of your life will you command? There is no answer. Education would make them officers and with that they will command those who command and exploit them. Politics also serves a similar purpose. When communities lose control over their means of production, they seek to control those who control them; politics and education become the twin tools. I understood now why Rakesh every now and then would think aloud, education is not welfare, it is politics. When education and politics converge into the same intent, social conflicts are bound to arise.

 

Kokrajhar is a disturbed district and I had a question in my list to ask around, what constituted the disturbance? It appears that in recent times, especially since 2010, everyday violence has ceased; I could frankly see no apparent damage. But now the non Bodos have come into the mood of retribution and hence they have chosen a more insidious path to violence, bad mouthing Bodos. I soon found out that I had been fed on a heavy dose of lies. I was told that all anganwadi posts were filled by Bodos. False. Every community had its own member as the anganwadi worker. I was told that every teacher was a Bodo. Wrong again, the Santhals had their own teachers. I was told that every school building was incomplete because the contractor was extorted and exhorted out. Wrong. School buildings were completed, even when they were only with a single class room. Bodos were constructed as villains through rumours and bad mouthing. They were the monsters to eliminate, the virus to be exterminated. Santhals were the worst in this respect. The Bengali Muslims merely “heard” such tales, but the Santhals seem to face genocide every day.

 

I was also told that the Bodo women stole rations from the midday meal. I was shocked but then Bodos were supposed to be animals, a species of homo sapiens less developed mentally and emotionally. He truth was contrary; in all the Bodo schools, midday meal was being cooked, the community paid out of their pockets when rations from Assam were not released. It was in the Santhal schools that midday meal scheme suffered because women had no role anywhere near the school. Wherever women were strong the meals did well. It did best in the Bengali speaking Muslim community where women were assertive and also had money.

 

The entire eastern region is culture conscious. People here have their standards of cultural refinement and cannot tolerate anyone not falling into such standards. This is why the Assamese have a deep contempt for the Bodos, disown them all the time. I recalled that my Assamese boss tried to tell me that in Kokrajhar there are Muslims who look like the Chinese; he was referring to the Bodos and he was an Assamese, he was in Assam at the height of the AASU movement, then why did he lie. He also lied that Kokrajhar could only be approached through Bengal and not via Guwahati. This was to mislead me; Kokrajhar is nearer to Guwahati than to New Jalpaiguri in West Bengal. And now Assam state government was on some fiction that Bodo women were stealing food from their own children stopped supplies meant for children’s nutrition. Also, they were under the influence of some corporate house to supply biscuits to the children. In fact, many teachers paid out of their own pocket to procure food for the children in the schools. Such sacrifice by teachers must also be recognized and lauded. But let the Brahmaputra not be generous to wash the sins of the Assamese.

 

If Santhals were against the Bodos, Bodos were ever so eager to appease the Santhals. They took up issues of the Santhali language, the appointment of the Assamese teacher who taught at a school of mixed communities and they were very eager to campaign against witch hunting among the Santhali communities. Bodos treated their girls very well, Santhalis in a bid to modernize, acquire political power have started marginalizing their women. The denial of their culture is also a part of the package to marginalize women. Girl child trafficking flows out of similar intentions. Had they access to facilities of the ultrasound, the Santhal community would also have killed the female fetuses.

 

The violence that was external has now travelled inside into social envy, prejudice, witch-hunting, rumour mongering. Santhals need someone to flay for their own desire to and failure in creating their oppressors. At one level they seek money at any cost even if that is through sale of children and prostitution because they are as yet too weak to become extortionists, at another level they create scapegoats to cover their deficiencies.

 

But why did the violence on the ground, a violence that was perpetrated by gangs of boys settle down after 2010? The key to this is the balbandhu scheme. The Balbandhu scheme is a rather clever move by the NCPCR, a kind of its own Salwa Judum to protect child rights which are abrogated during times of civic unrest. The Balbandhus are a band of young boys and girls who move about in the community beseeching the children to return to school, gathering community initiatives to put the school system back in place, invigilate other deliveries such as health and nutrition through the community health workers. Kokrajhar district has 37 Village Clusters, each cluster containing anything between four to as many as twenty villages depending on the population and size of these villages. The Balbandhu scheme operates in 20 out of the 37 village clusters and there are 20 balbandhus. But these balbandhus are not confined to single village clusters as they freely move around the community, throwing their weight at contractors who employ child labour, parents who do not send children to school, families who marry off young children, agents who smuggle children across borders into flesh trade and begging and reporting such matters to the police and the National Commission. The NCPCR has a list of indicators with which it wants to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the balbandhu scheme such as whether enrolment into school has improved, drop outs decreased, attendance improved and teaching become better. These are important things to do; but what has really happened due to the balbandhus is that the communities seem to have got a new purpose in living and thinking about their future, which reflects in an increased awareness towards education. In Kokrajhar, the balbandhus have brought about a new role model for the youth to follow rather than the rash, extortionist mafia image.

 

The balbandhu is a smart idea; they are in the same age group as the terrorists and the unsurrendered violent students groups and hence offer certain kind of competition to the glamour of the extortionists. The balbandhus are equally vigilante and yet they work to integrate rather than intimidate the people. The balbandhus have created not merely awareness about the Right to Education among the villagers but infused them with a new purpose in life after which they look more gathered up and sorted.

Posted in Travelogues | Leave a comment

Assam’s Multiculturalism 3/4

Assam’s Multiculturism

 

Assam is multicultural but not plural. No one culture dominates over others here; no one’s culture dominates here. People pursue a soulless alienating modernity. These were only words for me from Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed and had I not visited Assam I would have never known that such a reality exists. The elite of Assam are government servants; education is a step by step preparation towards appointment in various government posts. As government servants the elite is supposed to control society, verify identities and eliminate wannabes from true claimants. Such elite is an internal colonizer whose idea is to destroy the life of a community and the soul of its culture. Assam’s economy is such that there are government servants and contractors; those who cannot be employed in the government and cannot be contractors become politicians and if the space in mainstream politics is to narrow to accommodate them, then they become extortionists and militants. Education thus serves the only purpose of acquiring social power, inter communal competition over educational quotas thus constitutes the core of politics in the North east. Education neither creates a community life, nor deepens genuine democracy, and much less creates civil societies, skills, innovations or social leaders. In fact, education, the way it is designed can only create oppressors for the society. There is no culture in education, no power in cultures. Assam is a state, which like its other north eastern sister states, is progressing towards culturelessness.

 

The Bengali speaking Muslims are the socially dominant group. Despite a small demography they have done economically the best. And they are not contractors. They are farmers but so are the Santhals and the Bodos. But the Santhals and the Bodos farm to feed themselves, the Muslims farm to produce surpluses which are then reinvested in shops and agencies of consumer durables or taxi services. The attack against Muslims during the All Assam Students Union days in the plea that Bangladeshi migrants were infiltrating into Assam was a way to intimidate the Muslim community who always seemed to get large supplies of farm hands, who were neither the local Bodos nor the Santhals.

 

The Muslims could have had their say in Assam politics had they a better participation in the Freedom Movement. Partition of Bengal also cramped their style to a great extent. But the Muslims of Assam were part of the Mughal nobility and in some cases the generals of Hussain Shah as he invaded Kamatapur. Like the rest of their ilk, these Muslims stayed away from the vernacular nationalism of the Assamese Hindus and the Bengali Hindus. Many Muslims of Rangpur presently part of Bangladesh had worked their way up into moderate riches, the very same Muslims of who the famous sociologist Radhakamal Mukherjee regarded rather skeptically. To the Bengali Hindu, the economic prosperity of the Muslim was a problem because not being, to the Hindu mind, of a progressive culture Muslims might use their wealth to enter the elite intelligentsia and corrupt the exclusivity with a lesser culture.

 

The Santhals are obviously cast away workers of tea estates in Assam who inhabit the trenches and swamps of lower Assam. Poor and backward, the Santhals have awoken to a new consciousness and seriousness after the genocidal attack upon them by the Bodos in 1996. Ever since that year of insecurity, Santhals have become attentive to education, gained more social awareness, come up with a students’ union. But they have also become scheming, wicked, perverted, anti women, female child traffickers, politicized and socially envious and back stabbing. The line is straight; oppression, awareness and then desiring education and falling in the trap of a dehumanizing syllabus where one is straight jacketed, extracted out of culture and hate that self which is located within a system of community and human relation.

 

The Bodos demographically the most numerous tribes in the north east are expert bamboo craftsmen and weavers. Clans of the Bodos have ruled Kachar, or what is known as lower Assam. It is this space that they wish to rule again as the Bodoland. Assamese deny Bodos their existence as the Bodo demand for Deodhahi script shows. Assamese have not allowed the Bodos to use their script nor allowed Bodos to resuscitate the Deodhahi; the Bodos have to be content with devnagri, a script that does absolutely no justice to the language and its diction.

 

Apropos to the Bodos desire to return to a pre-British history, there is a demand for Kamatapur as well by the Koch Rajbanshis. Koch Rajbanshis ruled over Kamatapur, an area which covers a huge territory covering Bhutan, Assam, Meghalaya, Cooch Behar in West Bengal and the northern states of Bihar. Maharani Gayatri Devi was from the princely family of Cooch Behar, a Koch princess, who was married into the royal family of Jaipur. The Rajbanshis take this connection seriously and this has taken a stream of migrants from lower Assam into Jaipur and Jodhpur where it is common to find rickshawpullers, cooks and drivers from Bengal and Assam. For the Bengali Muslims who because of their economic wealth are also better educated find Jaipur an ideal city to send their children for higher education. For a small section of families who are directly related to the grand Mughals, Jaipur is home of their historical allies, the Rajputs. History continues here unpunctuated by British colonialism and by the modernizing nationalism of Freedom Struggle. Child marriage is still practiced in the region as witch hunting is a vestige of a medieval tradition. Balbandhus are a modernizing force, who intervene into such traditions and try and reform these.

 

The Bodo reassertion, the demand for Kamatapur, the rising envy of the Santhals and the gradual cultural marginalization of the Muslims show that every culture is now uprooted and its people fired into the vacuum of an alienating modernity. No wonder then that social conflict among communities becomes irresolvable. Everyone is rendered into cultural homelessness and bereft cultural capital, communities cannot mobilize social capital to sustain economic production or create assets needed for social status. There is only an empty space of the universal human being, uprooted, standardized, branded, and ahistorical. Neither education nor its alter ego politics, tries to revive the community’s soul by which it can become a productive agent, commanding life and controlling life chances. As dehumanized and standardized atoms, they command nothing, control nothing; they play communal politics by which one standardized atom  clings to others on the basis of some ethnic tie to become a larger homogenous mass than the others. No wonder then demography becomes important in democracy.

 

I am the last one to suggest that the citizen should return to the community; I am the last one to revive local ties and reinvent the feudal authority. All that I am saying is when we develop into universal citizens; we should universalize and liberate our cultures to enrich the universal. I am suggesting that if we are pursuing generalizations let not that abstract content dominate us from above; instead become a manifestation of our specific concrete. History becomes crucial to this project and I can see where the demand for Kachar and Kamatapur comes from. But there should be more to it. I ask the Bodo and the Koch student, do you want to rule your lands again? Yes, they nod enthusiastically. Then, imagine you are aleady kings and behave like one; kingdom will follow. But when you raise only demands and stall trains and block highways, you are behaving like victims, like beggars, stripped of all means, and now fighting with other beggars for the crumbs that the state government throws at you as grants and public investments. Communal politics is dog fight over territory for crumbs that someone happens to cast at you; it is not a politics where you command the means of production.

 

Notwithstanding the close link between demography and democracy, population for every community in Bodoland is declining save the Muslims. No wonder child marriage is so prevalent among them despite being better educated and culturally rooted. What a paradox ! Of the various challenges that democracy faces, demography interestingly is also one. No wonder that slowly, politics of the world’s largest and wonderful democracy is pulling into a zone beyond the will of the people. Political propaganda and the media are creating images to manipulate what people want; I think that I want a plush apartment in a gated colony, why though I have no idea.

 

Despite the many bandhs and frequent disruptions to normal life, life when it runs it does so with precision. An appointment at 9 in the morning means 9 in the morning; a person waiting at the Gosaingaon crossing means you will find him there. People are hardworking and dedicated and it is possible to call a rickshaw on mobile at the wee hours of the morning when you have to catch the 5 am Intercity Express to Guwahati.

 

Rakesh and I boarded a rickshaw for the railway station; fixed rates, no haggling and fixed points of boarding and alighting as well. Trains run on time whenever they are not held up. Our train stood there right on time but a backlog of goods trains carrying oil and coal were jostling for signals to clear them. I asked the students how come they continue to tolerate this colonial exploitation of Assam where the non renewable minerals move out of the state and no one but the companies get their royalties? They had no answer; it is so much simpler to fight the state and the political parties than to fight the companies. It has ever been so easy for Bengalis to fight Hindus-Muslims, East Bengal-Mohun Bagan, CPM-TMC than to fight the real looters, the Marwaris who lock up factories and migrate out capital and spread the rumours that Bengalis do not work.

 

Aboard the train a young woman lawyer who sat next to me told me exactly in five minutes the crux of our story. We are facing the Crisis of civilization; all of us are now consumers and towards this consumption we run exhausting our resources and reducing our opportunities; conflict and not cooperation dominates us. This is low thinking which pervades across Assam; here people imagine that the next door neighbor is the problem. For Assamese, Bodos are the problem, for Bodos everyone else is the problem, for Santhals their own people are problems, for the Muslims loss of power is the problem. Assam’s common life is defined by extreme standardization, mobile and motorcycle.

 

Back in Guwahati, I called up Tahir Ali, the man who drove us from the airport to the station on our way to Kokrajhar. Tahir was now to carry us back from Kamkhya to the airport. On the way we stopped for lunch at Paltanbazar and opted for a restaurant called Mahalakshmi, the same name as Rakesh’s wife. We ordered for some Burmese food. The man behind the counter refused to serve us the delicacies; they are not good he said. Then get us Assamese thali please, I said. The man said it was better for us to try the Bengali Thali. I understood what he meant. He suffered the same fear of failure I have seen throughout the Kachugaon bloc of Kokrajhar; he deprecated his own culture, felt ashamed of his cuisine, felt that it was not good for our palate. Assamese thali it is to be, I was steadfast. The meal came, sumptuous, salubrious.

 

Thoroughly pleased with myself after this hearty meal and relieved that Rakesh’s work had been partly complete, I looked around to absorb the sights and sounds. I suddenly realized that all through Assam I have seen something that I often do not get to see in Delhi; namely, the abundance of girl children! I realized that little girls were less seen around in north India, they were so abound in Assam, well dressed, well fed, confident and contented. I thanked Ma Kamakhya.

Posted in Travelogues | 4 Comments

Assam 4/4 Ma Kamakhya

Ma Kamakhya…. Assam 4/4
by Susmita Dasguptaon Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 9:26pm ·
Ma Kamakhya is one of the prime pilgrim attractions of Assam. Kamakhya is the name of the peetha, which means a place where parts of Sati fell when Lord Shiva danced around with her dead body and Vishnu used his sudarshan chakra to dissect the body into small pieces. At Kamakhya, a place in the Nilachal mountains in Guwahati, Sati’s uterus fell.  Hence the name Kamakhya; Kama means both desire as well as sex. I am particularly close to Ma Kamakhya, she being the family deity of my mother’s family and has a temple dedicated to her in a village in Burdwan.

I heard and believed in stories of how my mother’s ancestors had come from Kamarup and established a Hindu temple according to the farman of Murshid Kuli Khan, the then nawab of Bengal. My mother’s temple has no deity of the Goddess; instead there is a small figurine about six inches high which is seated on a lotus upon a waist high stem. Two female figures guard the lotus on either side and two old bearded men, one fair and one dark stand in the positions where Kartik and Ganesh stand in a Durga image. We assume that the two females are Lakshmi and Saraswati while the two bearded men are some sages, who they are we do not know. When we passed through a densely populated, well to do Nepalese village to reach to Kachugaon at whose heart lay a Santhal relief camp for our meeting with the balbandus meandering our ways through well fed and well cared for bovine population, I noticed a temple or two with exactly the same formation of the idols as in my mother’s village temple. Mother’s temple was not an anomaly; it was the way Kamakhya temples were usually organized. Kamakhya is invisible, she is an icon, invoking larger images through the hint of signs and symbols; she is niraakar, formless, empty. Her representations are not automatic as they must be sought and imagined. Whatever it is Kamakhya lends herself to imaginations, incantations and interpretations. All through the history of Kamatapur ruled by the Koch kings of Coochbehar, Kamakhya has united the left hand and the right hand of worship, the Brahminical and the Tantric worships and integrated the image worshipping Hinduism with the formlessness of Buddhism. Kamakhya is a unity in diversity, much like Assam herself, absorbing differences, resolving conflicts to integrate different paths into a common destination. I took a renewed interest in Ma Kamakhya.

What strikes me is the non visual aspect of the Indian culture. I have been only taught to understand the literate and oral cultures; it is now occurring to me that India has yet another axis, visual and non visual culture. Kamakhya belongs to the non visual tradition of the worshipper of the formless, Tantric, Alakh Niranjan, Nirankari, Bhakti, Sufi and other mystic branches of various religions. No wonder then the children of this region cannot “read” pictures. I could see from the face of the school teacher of Kaimari village of the Kachugaon bloc that he too was unable to interpret illustrations given in the book in a manner in which I did. Non visual cultures have a strong connection to non literate cognition in India, visual culture is perhaps related to literate cultures as well. Sensibilities of the two kinds are important to understand and build into pedagogy.

Kamatapur is also an area of metallurgy, of castings. Exquisite and delicate figurines from a mere inch in height to about eight inches are cast of alloys of as many as eight metals. It is an area of the textile trade, trade of betel leaves, arecanuts, jute fibre and now of coal, oil, natural gas and tea. Assam has always been the commodity hub of the land route of trade that would directly connect the Indian subcontinent to the Silk Route. Silk is produced in Assam as well. Assam is the last post for salt because after that when we trek eastewards, oil and salt disappear from the common person’s diet.

Kamatapur is also very central to the entire route of the Mongols from the north and the contending Pathans from the south eastern regions of Bihar and Bengal; it is the hub from where one proceeds via the cult of the Goddess into Himachal, Kashmir and from thereon to Punjab on one hand, to Nagaland and Manipur all along the Buddhist trail right upto China on the other. As for Bengal, one finds a tantric trail right from Nilachal Hills holding the Kamakhya Temple travelling all the way to Kolkata. Kamakhya, a deity that rose to prominence in the middle of the 17th century out of the patronage of the Koch Kings of Kamatapur is the very expression of its cultural diversity and the historical need for such pluralism.

Back in Delhi to 45 degrees dry heat from the cool rainy pre monsoon of lower Assam, or Kachar, or Bodoland.

Posted in Travelogues | Leave a comment

Amitabh @ Prateeksha

This is the full version of my published piece in Crest, TOI on the 6th of October 2012.

 

 

I was being a Great Gambler when I cast all prospects of my academic career into the winds and decided that for my doctoral programme I would work on Amitabh Bachchan who I in my student days often thought of as the usherer of my life. This was in the 1980’s when perhaps working on the sociology of cinema was unthinkeable. But to me cinema was a social phenomenon; it addressed people universally beyond class, caste, gender and age. I suspected that every human being had a conception of herself and in that mental image of hers, she ceased to be trapped in her socio-economic boundaries and transcend into a being. Of many lives I had seen, I realized that people latch on to film stars for an inner life and this inner life of humans, to my mind, was sociologically very important for shapes that societies take, for the kinds of histories they have, for the levels of cultures they acquire and so on. I was a student of JNU’s MPhil-PhD programme and because of my formidable performance in class; the academic panel did not know how to deny my research proposal in which I decided to create a space for a film star in the academic curricula. When my proposal was cleared I immediately contacted Soumya Bandopadhyay to introduce me in person to Amitabh Bachchan. Soumyada was Amitabh’s biographer and in the year 1989 very close to him. So on a bright autumn day of September in 1989 I went to meet Amitabh in his rented bunglow in Delhi’s Vasant Vihar.

Amitabh Bachchan’s style in those days was moist back brushed hair and spotless white khaddar with Kohlapuri sandals. He doused himself liberally with some expensive perfume, served us excellent Darjeeling tea and at once started speaking about how he felt that his being in Hindi film brought a new kind of energy in the people precisely because the characters he played always delivered solutions. Amitabh had just resigned from the Parliament and was shooting for Agneepath. I sensed that Amitabh developed some kind of a nervous discomfort at being studied and observed. But after a while he felt less threatened and turned to face me directly. “You are a good student”, he said, “a great career in the Universities and academic research I foresee. Why are you working on Amitabh Bachchan? Do you realize that you will be ruined?” I laughed condescendingly. ‘I don’t care”, I said, “ Copernicus was put to death for introducing new theories, so was Socrates. Main kaun hoon, kya naam hain mera, Socrates ko jab hemlock peena padha?” Amitabh showed adequate knowledge how the academic circle worked, what kinds of projects they valued, what kind of candidates they chose; he seems to have been very close to his father’s life as a an academic.

Though Amitabh had promised me help with my work, he did not keep his words. My questionnaires were never filled up, my queries sent to him by post never answered. I had to work around my project in a way in which interviews with the star had to be eliminated. I wrote my MPhil dissertation as a treatise in Idealism, using theories from the Germans from Fichte, Schelling, Kant, Hegel and down to Adorno. I wrote like them, using categories of aesthetics in my analysis where Amitabh turned into a Super consciousness, an ideal universal which was a process of continuous becoming. These were very tough issues to wade around and if one was not familiar with such expressions such as art being the moment where the world worlds, it was likely that one could get badly thrashed by the intellectual shrapnel of this school of philosophers. I sent a copy to Amitabh after I cleared my viva with flying colours. By this time, winter had set in with its salubrious days and cold nights.

One such afternoon as I sat working over an evaluation project of Tata Steel, my landlady called me up frantically in the office and insisted that I return home at once. I lived in a one room in a bungalow across my office with a Shrivastav couple. It seems that one Mr Gurudutt had come looking for me at home saying that Amitabh on receiving my dissertation has desired to immediately talk to me. I had no telephone at home and it seems that Amitabh had called up the Shrivastavs and they already had some exchange over both being of the same surname. Amitabh called me up that evening and said that he was overwhelmed with my work because I seemed to write the very words that he often thinks of. I assured him that I was no mind reader but I merely translated his films into a language with which he was also familiar because of his general access to literature and philosophy. He insisted that I visit him as soon as possible and that he would send me the air tickets and while I stayed with him he would take care of me so I did not need to worry. I was worried; I prefer hotels to homes and feel uncomfortable at being a house guest, Amitabh Bachchan notwithstanding. He must have read my mind and his secretary called me up to say that I could retire to the Centaur Hotel for my bed and bath while all meals and all waking hours will be spent at Prateeksha.

When I finally landed in Prateeksha I realized that I had internalized Amitabh Bachchan so deeply that nothing I encountered there was a surprise for me. I had anticipated every detail of Amitabh’s daily life. What I missed was how much Amitabh’s family seemed to look upon me as if I was the star and that they were hosting some celebrity. When an elderly relative visited them I overheard Teji say to the gentleman in a hushed tone that she was overwhelmed by me because I was so unassuming !!. Her reasons for being in awe of me was because Harivansh read through my work and then looked at my bibliography and had said to her that so many books even he had not read. Amitabh was certain that I be projected as some kind of a celebrity and this stance of his cowered Abhishek and Shweta down so much that when Shweta had to recite Harivanshrai’s poetry to me she shuffled and fidgeted nervously. His staff stood around me looking on eagerly whose preparation I relished most at lunch.

The family at Prateeksha was more eager to lay bare before me their failings and weaknesses rather than prove that they were better than the best. Weaknesses in maths, low scores in social sciences, fear of injections, allergies to food, incapability in business, failures in examinations, and denial of appointments were discussed openly and frankly. Children and the elderly participated equally in all conversations; nothing was held back, nothing was pushed under the carpets. It was a talkative house, an open house, where light and breeze flowed in as freely as discussions.

Amitabh was in command even in his private space. He commented on every course, where the okhra needed to be fried more, where salads had to be cut finer and where the curtain had to be placed so that the slanting rays of the winter sun did not hit the eye. Food was an important affair in Prateeksha; the diet intake of everyone at the table was taken note of and the nutrition followed carefully. One had to have the share of greens, of fibres, food had to be plentiful and eaten with respect and care. Amitabh’s family records of the past seven generation showed the family to have suffered hunger and deaths due to malnourishment.

Amitabh made a few rounds of appointments for me. I met Javed Akhtar and Subhash Ghai. I accompanied him to the sets of Akayla. I was introduced to Salim Khan and Ramesh Sippy as a genius. I wished that the earth would open up and swallow me in because here right in front of me were seated the makers of Sholay, the very film that had opened up my consciousness to the world of cinema and to Amitabh Bachchan. On the sets, Amitabh laid open my dissertation. He had marked certain portions of my work and asked me, what I meant by justified anger, what was the final destination of a rebel, does the ego always invoke an alter ego, when is existence threatened, what is violence, when is violence creative, what is death, what is the Heideggerian Being, is aesthetics only specific to art, what is poetry, what is epic, how is the cinematic experience different from watching a football match, what is a cinema, what is a star, what kinds of cinema succeeds and why and so on. I felt as if Amitabh was the proverbial crane and I was Yudhisthir as we sat by the breeze of a lake stretched out in a large swathe in the premises of Chandivili studio.

Amitabh’s home was grand, grand because of its simplicity. There was no sign of ostentation, whites dominated; floors were of grey kota, furniture sprawling but neat. Care was taken so that at no point of time wealth got shown off. There was austerity, discipline, organization and tidiness. What also delighted me was that writing stationery was kept at every nook and corner. Amitabh wrote down everything and insisted that at every conversation one needed to have writing things. This was a habit I valued very much and could easily see that such habits came from homes of academicians, also my family occupation.

In my inner eye I knew Amitabh very well and it really mattered very little whether I met him in mortal body or not. But it was Jaya who I really looked forward to see. I had been a fan of hers since I watched her Bengali film Dhanni Meye and never lost an opportunity to watch her films. As much as I took Amitabh normally, I actually gushed when I met Jaya. We had conversations around Amitabh in which Jaya expressed her displeasures with her husband’s choice of cinema, his performance and acting skills; Amitabh would try to defend himself often citing my dissertation in which all his absurd films were interpreted as specialized spiritual quests of mankind. Jaya, much exasperated sought my support in claiming that the Bengali culture was on the whole much superior to the UP tastes. Jaya had emerged from a brand of cinema we know as art cinema having worked with masters like Ray and middle of the road director, Hrishikesh Mukherjee. She regarded the commercial cinema more as plan B to fill in the blanks of idle time in the life of an artist. She felt betrayed that Amitabh, her thick friend and husband had changed over to emerge as a superhero in films that require him to dress like a eunuch and sometimes to drop off his lungi that too under the full gaze of Hema Malini !! “I am curious about one thing in Amitabh,” Jaya asked me, “what about his relations with women?” Then she added hurriedly, that she did not think that it was possible for Amitabh to have any lasting relationships with any woman. I felt a sense of insecurity lurking in her.

After a while that I conversed with her I felt like many of Jaya’s fans that she married the wrong man. They may have started off together but their paths had grown increasingly apart. Yet she was very much in love with him and in her vocal critique of him there was a desire to draw closer to him, possess him ever more. She felt that Amitabh had done quite the wrong thing by quitting politics. She read the step as being selfish and not willing to walk that extra mile for the people who loved him so dear. Sometimes I feel Jaya’s coming to politics and remaining there despite pressures to quit is an attempt to continue, on behalf of her husband, the journey which he abandoned. She continues the pilgrimage on behalf of her husband. More than self-fulfilment, this is her way of serving her husband.

Amitabh was his star self in his home looking over neatness and order from his towering height and overpowering gaze; unfortunately no one quite thought of him in this way. His employees were clearly ever alert at being pointed out for having missed out something like leaving doors open in the twilight hours when mosquitoes found their way into the house; his wife thought that he was waylaid and in bad company of men; his children felt he poked and teased too much, and his brother felt that he needed to be managed. But there was no one who regretted as much as Teji that Amitabh never studied English literature for then he would surely have been a professor by now. The more she heard about our faculty in JNU the more she felt that Amitabh had indeed lost a chance of a lifetime when he came to films and not the University!

Posted in Media Sociology | Leave a comment

X and Y

X and Y.

by Susmita Dasgupta on Tuesday, August 7, 2012 at 8:52am ·

.

We referred to this gentleman as Y..da. The only thing I recall about him is that in the past thirty years that I have occasionally bumped into him he has never spoken. I never heard his voice. I think that I classify him in my mind as the man I have never spoken to. Y..da is one who recedes into the shadows at any social gathering. His wife, who we call as X di is beautiful, tall, with long dark hair falling straight and thick beyond the waist into a fat braid, her eyes always shining with natural kohl of her thick eyelids, her teeth framed as pearl and her body held gaunt and upright as her hips swayed rhythmically with every step. She is the personification of the stuff that the novelists in the 1970’s Bengal wove their pens with. I always wondered why this graceful and charming lady at all married a gawky and toad eyed man who always slipped back into shadows if you ever ventured to even greet him in your courtesy as the host of the party. Theirs was an arranged match, negotiated by parents through advertisements in Ananda Bazar Patrika. I was a high school student in the days they were married and in my first flush of feminism I realized that the parents of X di must have merely responded to the lines such as wanted a beautiful girl, tall, slim, fair and educated without ever wondering what the advertiser had to offer. Y da was dark, toad eyed, broad faced and without a personality to reckon.

Yet Y..da was supposed to be brilliant; he was an IITian, a class fellow of my pishemoshai. Pishe said that he was the class topper. Y da for most of the times I knew him had no job. He tried to do some business here and there but to no avail. X di did all the earning; she was brilliant too and soon found herself a teaching job in one of Kolkata’s top schools. She also did a lot of tuitions, she being a science teacher; students just did not stop flowing into her home. I never visited their home but my parents warn me never to venture anywhere near it. The reason was simple; the rented flat that they occupied for generations was so dilapidated that strong twines were used to secure a crashing stairway and a loosely hanging balcony. When Kolkata faced some mild tremors or got vulnerable in torrential rain, X di arranged to get someone to change the ropes. They were hard up for money because Y da never really earned and how much can a school teacher though loaded with private tuitions earn? definitely not as much to remain in our social class. So I, despite my socialisms never thought much of them. Perhaps so did many among us in the social circle. Yet X di was unfazed; she attended all the social functions with her usual confident dazzle, wore nice sarees and gave worthy gifts. Never did she let her money come in the way of her socializing.

They had two children; a girl and then after a few years a boy. The children grew brilliant. X di got them the best education. They rose and rose. They were soft hearted, modest, but brilliant. Soon they got wonderful offers with unimaginably high salaries. So the scenario around X di changed; she was now well rested, well nourished, well cared for in a plush flat that her daughter bought for them. The daughter never married though her qualifications, income levels and fair skin forever attracts a slew of proposals; I do not think that the young woman intends to marry because if she has to be a bread winner what does she want a passenger in the form of a house husband for. The son married and just bought a flat.

Y da died three days ago; his family is crashed. X di and the children are devasted; they say how they are going to ever live without the father. In a sense of ending, I go back to the story that I left thirty long years ago in Kolkata to think about Y da. How daft of me to never have noticed. Y da never could work because his professional pride did not find a suitable employer. He was a IITian topper and he deserved freedom to pursue his innovations to take India to the next level of technology. But he is of a generation when not technology but profits came to dominate and soon all IIT graduates would be selling chocolates and edible oils as IIM pass outs to earn salaries in order to have sprawling drawing rooms. Y da never cared for such plush; he had no problems staying on in sooted rooms without white wash for years; he wished to look after his parents and so he never ventured out of the city. All he wanted was to be able to do higher things in life those which necessarily did not give him money. His ethics did not suit the Marwari brand of business that was developing in Kolkata who laughed at the Bengali because all that brilliance could not beget money. He was too proud to work to make money for his employer. He lived in an idealized world of ethics and morality, of intellect and self-pride. Such a world was not to be and so Y da would recoil into his shell and never thought of interacting with anyone of us. All the while we looked down on him; he was probably the arrogant one thinking of us as being beneath him.

Anyway Y da stayed at home. He cooked, looked after the children, taught them, honed their brilliance and brought a sense of focus into their lives. He looked after his parents, kept them company and became the comfort zone to which his family could come home to. He was the one who shouldered the backroom tasks while his wife and children performed in the world outside. The success of his children, the bloom of his wife and the comfort of his parents when they died of old age bears testimony to the fact that Y da must have looked after the home very well. But these are unpaid services we never notice; not in women and even less so for men. And all the while at home, he taught ethics to his children, made them into good human beings even while they were unusually brilliant and now unusually successful.

Everyone is sad for X di, surely she deserved better than Y da. Even my eyes are so coloured by patriarchy that I never saw Y da in his place; my vision is so blurred by associating happiness and success with money that I never noticed how rich the family was in self-honour, pride and morality. While we talk of men as sharing the housework, allowing the wife to take all decisions, looking after children and having non-competitive sensibilities I realize how little we get to value such men should they be our husbands and sons-in-law. Y da died young considering that we get to live longer these days. May be he finally felt like a loser and so illness crept upon him and claimed his life. But he made a valiant struggle to hold on to his ideals and principles against patriarchy, against capitalism, against materialism. We were probably his class enemy and so he never opened up to any of us; I am curious to know who were among his conversation circle, or the adda circle as we call in Calcutta. I will ask my mother to find that out discretely when she attends Y da’s shraddha.

Posted in Family Matters | Tagged | Leave a comment

Zindagi Badi Honi Chahiye, Lambi Nahin…

The first Hindi film I saw which I also happened to follow and recall was Aradhana. It was in a large group of uncles and aunts and cousins that we went to watch the film in a modest theatre in Behala of Kolkata. I think that Bulimashi got married and she being the youngest of her eight siblings, the large family of my mother’s decided to celebrate the moolah obtained from her husband as the gatekeeping money to the hilt by watching the new release called Aradhana with Sharmila Tagore in it. This was the film that also catapulted Rajesh Khanna to superstardom. The fall out of this film on us children was that my cousins and I could mimic the film, scene by scene and dialogue by dialogue. In such acts of imitation, we would identify with the heroine. Rajesh Khanna was not the principle point of view.

But for the world around me, Dola Aunty, my private tutor, Geeta, our young maid servant, Saloni Pandey, my class friend were all ready to swoon by Rajesh Khanna. Dola Aunty bought piles of magazines those carried stories of the star; she would conspire to teach children of those mothers who subscribed to a large number of film magazines. Geeta lived from one Rajesh Khanna film to the other while Saloni Pandey showed an amazing academic talent in referencing enormous material on the star. Soon we were inundated by Rajesh Khanna look alikes; the tailor, the barber, the vegetable vendor started sporting the Rajesh look. Baidyanath, my grandfather’s driver from Chaibasa tried to have a wave of hair over his forehead notwithstanding the “tiki” at the back of his skull. He was the repository of the lyrics of the songs of Rajesh Khanna. Even my young cousins proudly wore “Guru shirts”, shirts more like kurtas and designed after the ones that Rajesh Khanna wore in the film Kati Patang.

Frankly, I remained out of all this. Rajesh Khanna invoked femininity. I was not a pursuant of such sentiments. So when Amitabh Bachchan came, I took to him like fish to water. I also revelled that he and not Rajesh Khanna was the superstar. But even as I worked on Amitabh Bachchan, I could never quite get over the fact that it was Rajesh Khanna who brought forth the first ever idea of a superstar. I heard these stories that Geeta collected; she was illiterate and the media not being what it is today, I have no idea where she got her facts from. We made fun of her when she would tell us that women wore sindur on their partings with Rajesh Khanna’s photograph in front of them. Later I read from published sources that these stories were true. Rajesh Khanna was God and Geeta was the devotee; his exploits had a way of reaching her, I don’t quite know how. In one of his interviews Amitabh said that he has seen women take the dust from the tyres of the car that carried Rajesh Khanna and rub that on their heads. Such was the madness that Rajesh Khanna commanded. The more I worked on Amitabh Bachchan, the more uncomfortable I felt about not being able to analyse Rajesh Khanna well. After all, he was India’s first superstar and generated certain madness about him that no one but no one has ever been able to match.

Many decades later when I moved in Delhi’s Sarvapriya Vihar, Rajesh Khanna was my neighbour. There was a tiff with him once or twice over parking of cars and hence with much trepidation I used to often peep into his ground floor drawing room to see whether he had retired for the day. He often had curtains drawn open, would change into his night clothes and with his reading glasses on would handle high piles of files using the centre table as his writing desk while he sat on the floor. Those days he was in the Congress Party and had rented the flat in our locality. I was always struck by his single minded focus on the files; such attentiveness I have never witnessed in anyone I knew. This power of concentration struck me with an extraordinary amazement.

One day I sent him a note saying that I wanted to see him. In the note I said that I was sorry that I never made efforts to study him while I worked on my doctorate thesis on Amitabh Bachchan and if possible I wished to now start the process of unpacking his magical appeal. He granted me an appointment immediately. As I sat sipping Lopchu tea, Rajesh Khanna was very angry that when I was Amitabh’s house guest in Mumbai, the latter had misled me into believing that Rajesh never wanted to see me. How untrue all this is, he exclaimed. He believed that Amitabh had played really dirty politics with him especially manipulating Hrishikesh Mukherjee. Rajesh Khanna was also angry with Rishi Kapoor, who according to him was even more serpentine in crookedness. Clearly Rajesh Khanna was a person who had resentments. After he had spoken his mind and was more receptive to my presence, I asked him, where does Rajesh Khanna live now? Rajesh Khanna? He repeated; well Rajesh Khanna is a very big star, he told me, a larger than life figure, he overshadows everyone else on screen but I am Jatin Khanna yaar. It was this sentence alone that made me interested in Rajesh Khanna the person ever since.

Truly, as Jatin Khanna had said, Rajesh Khanna is a shadow; he lives nowhere. He is actually no one. He never was anything except an illumination. Very recently, Cine Durbaar arranged a memorial service for Shakti Samanta, the director who created the superstar called Rajesh Khanna. In the memorial service the director’s son gave us a snapshot of his father’s life. Shakti Samanta’s father was in the airforce and was martyred in the 1947 war. He came away with his young widowed mother to live among his relatives. In Aradhana, Rajesh Khanna too is an air force pilot who loses his life in a campaign and Sharmila Tagore is widowed pregnant with her dead husband’s child. Aradhana was Shakti Samanta’s story around his mother. The image of the young widow has featured also in Kati Patang and Rajesh Khanna is the angel who comes in to rescue this widow out of her loneliness. I had a distinct feeling that Rajesh Khanna was Shakti Samanta’s search of a lover for his young widowed mother. Rajesh is a saviour who comes in to breathe life and loveliness into women, ignored and isolated. No wonder then Rajesh Khanna is a fantasy for those who are hemmed inside homes, pincered inside spaces defined for them for incarceration into their fixed social roles with predefined expectations. He is an invitation for such souls to fly out, to float out, and to experience the openness of space and the lightness of air. This openness was his appeal; this lightness, his illumination.

Rajesh Khanna’s progenitor was Shakti Samanta, but the man who settled him in superstardom was Hrishikesh Mukherjee. In two films namely Anand and Bawarchi, Hrishikesh makes the final articulation of Rajesh Khanna’s spirit; the man who provides pleasure, the man who assures but he himself remains unnoticed and unseen. This is why the huge life giving force of Anand had to be concealed in his imminent death and he had to disappear into oblivion after he settles everything for the chaotic household in Bawarchi. Oblivion was Rajesh Khanna’s final destiny for the light giver cannot be seen; for in order to be seen one has to absorb light. Rajesh Khanna could never have been “around” in the way Amitabh Bachchan is. Principally such continued presence beyond the screen would have been contrary to Rajesh Khanna’s appeal.

The time that I met Rajesh Khanna Shah Rukh Khan’s Devdas was released. Rajesh told me that he wanted to watch the film. I offered to take him to take him to PVR’s Premier Class. He did not agree. He said that he wanted to whistle wildly at Madhuri Dixit and that was not possible in civilized society. He would not like to stay on in Aashirwaad because while his daughter really looked after him well, he would like to open the verandah door and stand in the rain and that would wet the carpets and cause inconvenience for everyone. He wanted to be just wild, melt into the nature, mingle into the light, and dissolve in the rain. He could not be among people with routine, with lives to lead and schedules to abide by.

I suddenly realized that Rajesh Khanna was also the person who created two other superstars, namely S.D.Burman and later R.D Burman and Kishore Kumar. Kishore Kumar wanted to expand; give me more space to move he would say; make me faster, carry me further, lift me higher. S.D would despair at Kishore because the scale had only seven notes. Then all of them found Rajesh Khanna, the body so rhythmic, one that had such lightness of being, such potential of dissolving into emptiness, just like S.D’s rhythms. In the opening song of Aradhana, Rajesh Khanna atop the jeep drives alongside the train singing in Kishore’s voice, Mere Saapnon Ki Raani, with Pancham’s mouth organ keeping the beat and as Rajesh sways almost like the thin breeze against the vast landscape and rolling hills, Kishore’s voice gets the broad movement that he has always looked for. Kishore’s voice leaves his body and embraces the world, moving at the speed of the train. Rajesh carries the voice, impersonates the spirit of the music and together with Kishore Kumar’s voice and S.D’s music weaves together the vastness of the landscape and the pace of the train. One wonders whether S.D.Burman and R.D.Burman or Kishore Kumar could have been what they were had Rajesh Khanna not lived on screen to embody the music. I sometimes feel that Rajesh Khanna was the personification of the song in the Hindi film; that song which is supralingual, comes into play where articulation must be transcended. No wonder it is difficult to talk about him but easy to sway in small pulses to the softer rhythms of music, just like his mannerisms were.

We left Sarvapriya Vihar to come away to our present locality. Rajesh Khanna also changed his flat to occupy the one adjacent to the one that had been ours. Our maid Tara continued to work with the new occupants of our flat. Rajesh Khanna would often stroll in the terrace right next to her. We used to be Tara’s confidantes; the last time we met Tara it seemed that Rajesh Khanna was her advisor in matters of daily interest.

Posted in Film Reviews | Tagged | 1 Comment